CASR  
 —
 Afghanistan
NATO~ISAF

-
Canadian
Defence Policy,
Foreign Policy,
& Canada-US
Relations

-

CASR Home

NATO / ISAF
Afghanistan

Afghanistan – NATO ~ ISAF  –  2006


Armoured Vehicles - NATO/ISAF - Southern Afghanistan  –  December  2006

Punching at Panjwaii  –  Canadian Leopard Tanks in Combat
CF Tracked Vehicles Tackle the Taliban  and Afghan Winters


Stephen  Priestley ,  CASR   Researcher / Illustrator
Into Action  –  Canadian  Leopard C2 tanks and  the TLAV M113A3s in Combat

After a month of settling in and training, the Leopard C2 tanks of  B Squadron of Lord Strathcona's Horse (RC) are on the move. On 03 Dec 2006 (Afghan time) the tanks rolled out of the Kandahar Airfield compound  heading for Panjwaii District. The Leopards form a new direct fire unit capable of  punching  through  the thick, mud-brick walls (left) that typify much of Panjwaii District and caused Canadian troops problems during Operation Medusa.

Read  the  full  article  on  the  CF  deployment  of  tracked  vehicles

Afghan National Army - Army Recruiting - Military Pay  –  November  2006

Only a Strong Afghan National Army can secure Afghanistan
A Point of View from an Afghan writer and military historian


Dr.  Assem  Akram,  an  Afghan  historian  currently  living  in  the  US
Security  in  Afghanistan  cannot  be  separated  from  full  regional  security

Without security  for Afghanistan,  there can be  no stability, no reconstruction,  no education,  no human rights  ( let alone women's rights ),  no investment, no development, no growth. It  is,  therefore,  essential  for all  nations who sincerely  wish to  see  the  people  of  Afghanistan  return  to  a  normal  life, to concentrate  their  efforts  on  one  goal:  a  robust,  sizable, and  visible  Afghan  National  Army  (ANA),  capable  of  maintaining  security in all  the  Afghan  provinces,  supporting  the  authority  of  the  Kabul  government.

Read  full  article  on  the  need  for  domestic  Afghan  security  forces

Blast  Resistant  Vehicles  –  Study  of  US  Fatalities  in  Iraq  –  June  2006

Battling  the  Bomb - Makers:   an  Unclassified  Study  of
Iraq Fatalities  vs  Vehicle Type  –  Lessons  for  the  CF?

Press reports broadly indicate that the reason  [ for higher US Army fatality rates] is larger, more sophisticated, and better-placed roadside bombs. The Army's own fatality reports support this.

The question, then,  is how to limit  fatalities by equipping the troops with better armoured transport, while still preserving their ability to undertake their missions. For  mounted  troops ,   the  mechanism  is  obvious: troops riding  in trucks and  Humvees  present  more enticing  targets  than  troops  on  foot ,  since  they are necessarily clustered, but relatively unprotected (even if  [the target vehicle has been] 'up-armored' ).

Read a Summary of  Conclusions from a Working Paper  by  James  Hasik.

CF  in  Southern  Afghanistan  –  Afghan  Women  –  March  2006

Wondering why Canadian Forces are in Kandahar Province?
Afghan Women tell us what life was like under the Taliban.


Excerpts from a list of restrictions imposed on Afghan women and children.

[Ed:  If  it  were not for  the presence of our Canadian Forces,  along  with  other troops deployed  by both  NATO and  non-NATO countries, the Taliban  would  return.  They continue to be backed by powerful factions within the Pakistani government, their Army and the Intelligence Service.  If  the Taliban were allowed to once again take over power
in Afghanistan, their extreme restrictions on
the lives of ordinary people  –  especially on the lives of women  –  would be re-instated.]

Read  excerpts  taken  from  a  website  maintained  by  Afghan  women.

Previous Articles  –  Canada in Afghanistan  –  2004


Canadian Arctic Sovereignty