|
CASR
— Afghanistan
NATO~ISAF
|
- Canadian Defence Policy, Foreign
Policy, & Canada-US Relations -
|
|
|
Afghanistan – NATO ~ ISAF – 2006
|
Armoured Vehicles - NATO/ISAF - Southern Afghanistan –
December 2006
Punching at Panjwaii – Canadian Leopard Tanks in Combat
CF Tracked Vehicles Tackle the Taliban and Afghan Winters
Stephen Priestley , CASR Researcher / Illustrator
Into Action – Canadian Leopard C2 tanks and
the TLAV M113A3s in Combat
After a month of settling in and training, the Leopard C2 tanks of B Squadron of Lord Strathcona's Horse
(RC) are on the move. On 03 Dec 2006 (Afghan time) the tanks rolled out of the Kandahar Airfield compound
heading for Panjwaii District. The Leopards form a new direct fire unit capable of punching
through the thick, mud-brick walls (left) that typify much of Panjwaii District and caused Canadian
troops problems during Operation Medusa.
Read the full
article on the CF deployment of tracked vehicles
|
Afghan National Army - Army Recruiting - Military Pay
– November 2006
Only a Strong Afghan National Army can secure Afghanistan
A Point of View from an Afghan writer and military historian
Dr. Assem Akram, an Afghan historian currently living in the US
Security in Afghanistan cannot be separated
from full regional security
Without security for Afghanistan, there can be no stability, no reconstruction, no education,
no human rights ( let alone women's rights ), no investment, no development, no growth. It
is, therefore, essential for all nations who sincerely wish
to see the people of Afghanistan return to a normal life,
to concentrate their efforts on one goal: a robust, sizable,
and visible Afghan National Army (ANA), capable of maintaining
security in all the Afghan provinces, supporting the authority of
the Kabul government.
Read full
article on the need for domestic Afghan security
forces
|
Blast Resistant Vehicles – Study of
US Fatalities in Iraq – June 2006
Battling the Bomb - Makers: an
Unclassified Study of Iraq Fatalities vs Vehicle Type – Lessons
for the CF?
Press reports broadly indicate that the reason [ for higher US Army fatality rates] is larger, more
sophisticated, and better-placed roadside bombs. The Army's own fatality reports support this.
The question, then, is how to limit fatalities by equipping the troops with better armoured transport,
while still preserving their ability to undertake their missions.
For mounted troops , the mechanism is obvious: troops riding in
trucks and Humvees present more enticing
targets than troops on foot , since they are necessarily clustered, but
relatively unprotected (even if [the target vehicle has been] 'up-armored' ).
Read a Summary of Conclusions from a Working Paper by
James Hasik.
|
CF in Southern Afghanistan
– Afghan Women – March 2006
Wondering why Canadian Forces are in Kandahar Province?
Afghan Women tell us what life was like under the Taliban.
Excerpts from a list of restrictions imposed on Afghan women and
children.
[Ed: If it were not for the presence of our Canadian Forces, along with
other troops deployed by both NATO and non-NATO countries, the Taliban would
return. They continue to be backed by powerful factions within the Pakistani government, their Army and the
Intelligence Service. If the Taliban were allowed to once again take over power in Afghanistan, their
extreme restrictions on the lives of ordinary people – especially on the lives of women
– would be re-instated.]
Read excerpts
taken from a website maintained by Afghan women.
|
|
|