Canadian American Strategic Review

CASR
Home

Mod Prop
Index

Background
CCV Project

Background
FLCS Project

In Detail
Index

DND101
Intro

A Modest Proposal  —  Clearing a Route to the Close Combat Vehicle

Make Do and Mend mit Marder? —  Fielding a New Close Combat Vehicle
Refurbishing used German Marder IFVs as CCVs for the CF was a long shot.  But, recent economic events have conspired to put this dark horse into the lead.  The Close  Combat  Vehicle  Project was put to the Cabinet at the end of 2007 just as it was becoming apparent  that Canada was not  immune from a  global  economic  meltdown. DND's timing couldn't have been worse. If the CCV project is to come to fruition, the chosen vehicle must be budget-friendly to satisfy the politicians and ready for Afghani- stan  to make sense to the citizenry.  A tall order  –  especially with Canada's track record on used equipment.

CCV must survive close combat engagements which, in  Afghanistan,  primarily means IEDs. The Marder 1A5s deployed  with  ISAF  have greater mine protection but  there is still  room for improvement (add-on AMAP panels or the like). A second hurdle is weapons  – Marder's main armament is a 20mm while CF standard is 25mm. For quick deployment, it may be best to follow the example of  the Leopard 2A6M and keep those German guns – at least initially. [1]

As time (and budgets) allow, more vehicles could be refurbished and 'Canadianized'. One possibility would be mounting the same turret chosen for coming LAV III upgrade or  fleet augmentation. Whether that will  be a manned  turret (left) or a  remote weapons system (top left) remains to be seen. Either way, a final armament choice for both CCV and LAV III/Hs should be made at the same time. There is economy of  scale but,  more important, are supply lines and commonality for training, maintenance, parts etc. There is also an opportunity  to make both vehicle types as well-armed as newer CCV candidates like the SPz Puma and CV90 family. [2] That raises another point. A substantial family of specialist type Marder vehicles exist  but  Canada can develop its own designs.

As with any upgrade program,  'the devil is in the details'.  Anticipating CCV variants is less important for DND than seeking opportunities to do the jobs here at home. Finding qualified facilities able to perform such tasks has been difficult  for DND. Linkage with industry is not popular within military circles. But that's now the least of their worries. The citizens will support procurement only if projects are tied  to  Canadian economic stimulation. To avoid public backlashes to plans (like rebuilding tanks in German plants), DND must  find ways to employ Canadians, enriching their own country.

[1] Of course, the Leopard 2A6M's Rheinmetall 120mm main gun is central to the system. Here, we refer to the secondary armament  –  the coaxial and pintle-mounted 7.62mm machineguns.  In both cases,  Canadian tankers have adjusted from C6s to the original, German MG3s. Introducing a new ammunition type (20 x 139mm) would be awkward and expensive but it would allow the CF to field refurbished Marders in Afghanistan quickly.  The number of  deployed CCVs would be comparatively small.  Crews could train on unrefurbished Marder 1A3s.
[2] The same 30mm main gun which arms the Puma has been trialled on the Marder hull (in a Kuka turret). Turrets for the CV90 series IFVs are separate commercial products made by Saab Bofors (hulls by  Land Systems Hägglunds).  A Bofors turret can be mounted on Marder.