|
CASR
|
- Canadian Defence Policy, Foreign
Policy, & Canada-US Relations - |
|
In Detail
——
the CF18 Hornet fighter
—— |
|
by Allan Ng
M.Eng.,
P.Eng. |
|
|
Canadian Defence Procurement – November 2003
The CF18 Hornet fighter aircraft – In Detail (Part 6)
Allan Ng examines the evolution and development
of the CF's fighter
Out of Sight ... Beyond Visual Range Combat
Medium-Range or Beyond Visual Range (BVR) air-to-air combat became possible with the introduction of reliable
radar-guided missiles in the 1960s. Fighter aircraft could now launch a missile and destroy an adversary before
either aircraft is even seen. In BVR air combat, the fighter that can detect its adversary first
obviously has the advantage. So, good BVR fighters must have a very capable sensor suite. The primary
long-range sensor for fighter aircraft is the modern multi-mode radar. Next, the fighter aircraft must be able
to carry, launch, and direct multiple long- or medium-range air-to-air missiles (MRAAMs).
So, if one has a large radar and MRAAM then the engagement is decided right? Not exactly. Aircraft
performance is still import. Good engine thrust, as measured by the thrust-to-weight ratio (T/W), is an
important factor in BVR engagements. A high T/W helps an aircraft manoeuvre quickly into favourable firing
positions for the MRAAM. It also improves the aircraft's acceleration giving the MRAAM extra energy
to extend its range and get the missile to the target faster. On the other hand, a fighter
aircraft's turn-performance comes into play when attempting to escape enemy missile fire.
A typical MRAAM can easily out-turn any fighter aircraft. However, the missile is only able to maintain
this level of performance through specific portions of its flight envelope. The missile's rocket motor
delivers maximum thrust at the start of the missile's flight. Missiles are most manoeuverable during
this phase – aircraft caught within this stage of the missile's flight envelope will likely be
destroyed. This part of the envelope is, appropriately, called the 'no-escape zone'. However, due to
size and weight restrictions, missiles carry severely limited fuel. Eventually the rocket propellant is
exhausted, the missile runs out of thrust, and must coast towards its target. Most medium- and long-range
engagements end with missiles gliding on their stubby wings as guided darts. Decreasing speed not only lessens
the chances of catching up with an intended target, it also has deleterious effects on the missile's
aerodynamic control surfaces. This is the point where the fighter aircraft under attack has the
opportunity to out-turn the intercepting missile and escape its own destruction. In other words, many of the
same characteristics that make for a good dogfighting aircraft, also proved to be vital in the BVR arena.
As we've seen, the CF18 has a better than average thrust-to-weight ratio matched with relatively low wing
loading. The aircraft had a very capable multi-mode radar
in the Hughes APG-65 set that provided guidance for its AIM-7
Sparrow MRAAMs. This combination of radar and missile made the CF18 quite capable in BVR
combat. Baseline CF18s had somewhat reduced BVR capabilities compared with the F-14 Tomcat and F-15
Eagle (both of which had much larger radar antennae [1] ). But, CF18s did provide BVR capabilities
that early F-16s simply did not possess. The CF18 was an excellent compromise.
|
|
[1] The larger antennae of the F-14's AWG-9 and F-15's APG-63 naturally require larger radomes
and greater fuselage cross-sections. Hughes (now Raytheon) was responsible for both the APG-63 and the
F/A-18's APG-65. The latter weighs only 70% and has 50% of the volume (less the antenna) of the earlier
APG-63 radar set.
|
|
|