|
CASR
Canadian American
Strategic Review
|
- Canadian Defence Policy, Foreign
Policy, & Canada-US Relations - |
|
New Afghan Strategy – US Military Reports
– New President – January 2009
US Military – New Deployments & New Strategy in Afghanistan
Canada should keep an open mind about extension of CF mission
Edited excerpts of article published
by Associated Press (AP)
[1]
US Commander in Afghanistan , General David McKiernan ,
wants Stryker Brigades
As the Pentagon looks to double the existing force in Afghanistan, the overall cast of the
military's growing force in Afghanistan is becoming clearer. Commanders want to beef
up the expeditionary units and trainers in the south and east with enough new troops to
stem the violence, without being an occupying force that would alienate the Afghan
population.
Their challenge is to get troops into the hundreds of tiny villages in the
volatile southern region, where the Taliban insurgency has been centered.
To do that, General David McKiernan, the top US Commander
in Afghanistan, has asked for more mobile forces. He believes that
the US Army's LAV III-based Stryker vehicles [ below] will allow soldiers to move more easily along the rugged trails
to the widely dispersed tribal enclaves.
Stryker Brigade Combat Teams
Each of these US Army combat teams comes out - fitted with
several hundred eight-wheeled, nineteen-ton armoured vehicles.
Strykers offer greater protection than ' Humvees ' ,
but are more manoeuvrable than the heavily armoured,
mine-resistant vehicles that are being used across Iraq.
[Left: US Army Stryker with cage]
Army and Marine commanders still wrangling over which troops
are needed where [2]
By the end of January 2009, Defense Secretary Robert Gates is expected to approve sending more Marines
to southern Afghanistan, effectively lowering their numbers in Iraq's western Anbar province.
Gates is also expected to approve the deployment of the Camp Lejeune,
NC-based 2nd Marine Expeditionary Brigade ( MEB ) to Afghanistan by the end of January.
But senior officials say they are still working out the numbers. A MEB can vary in size
and makeup, and can swell to as many as 20,000 Marines, although a total that
high is unlikely.
Senior military officials say there is general agreement on cutting back the number of Marines in Iraq,
but US Army officials still have concerns about how to free up the Stryker vehicles.
With generals heading the Iraq war reluctant to give up troops, and those
in Afghanistan demanding more help, Pentagon officials have been struggling to stretch an already-strained
force to meet both needs. There is already increasing pressure to more rapidly reduce forces in
Iraq, to meet Barack Obama's stated intention to make Afghanistan the
higher priority.
The Key Question: What will be the overall goal in
Afghanistan for Obama's Team ?
The answer to the question of the Obama team's overall goal for Afghanistan will ultimately
determine the size and makeup of force structure. Will President Obama continue out-going President
George W. Bush's emphasis on spreading freedom and democracy? That would create
the need for an extensive, lengthy, and diverse effort to stabilize and modernize
the weak Afghan government, build infrastructure, and require a commitment for decades or more.
Or, will President Obama decide that the mission is simply to do enough military damage
to ensure that Taliban, Al Qaeda, and other terror groups in Afghanistan – and those along the
Pakistan border – are dismantled or defeated enough to prevent another attack on
America?
Pentagon press secretary, Geoff Morrell, told reporters that Obama and his national security team
are still discussing the Afghanistan strategy and how it will take shape. Fundamentally, Morrell said,
it will be a counter - insurgency fight. President Obama, advised by Secretary
Gates and the various US military leaders, "will ultimately come to some understanding about where this
president wants to lead the mission in Afghanistan."
How to meet the urgent need for US support forces in
both Iraq and Afghanistan ?
Under a US-Iraq security agreement, American combat forces must be out of Iraqi cities
by June of 2009, and out of the country by 2011. But support forces – ranging from
intelligence and surveillance experts to engineers and logistics personnel – are
specialists the Iraqis do not have. Iraq will continue to require US assistance with all these
specialties for some time.
At the same time, those are the same forces McKiernan needs in Afghanistan to
build the infrastructure for his growing force and to set up surveillance, particularly
along the border with Pakistan. Pentagon officials have said they plan to send up
to 30,000 additional troops to the Afghan war, including four ( 4 ) combat brigades and
thousands of support forces. Of those, Secretary Gates said
that three (3) brigades, and some of the support troops, will
go into Afghanistan by the summer of 2009. [ A US brigade is roughly
3500 troops.]
Re-deployments have begun, but Full Increases in troop levels
await Military Reviews
Even as decisions on major units have been delayed, Gates this week approved the deploy- ment
of about 2000 new support troops to Afghanistan, including about 660 Navy
sailors from a construction and engineering unit based in
Gulfport, Mississippi. These sailors, known as Seabees, can deploy quickly
for emergencies or disasters, to build roads, bridges, and other facilities. A few hundred
Seabees serving in Kuwait have already been transferred to Afghanistan, according to the
Navy. The other support forces include military police, medical personnel, and
logistics specialists.
Future troop levels also depend on the outcome of several military reviews of the
Afghani- stan strategy that are underway or recently completed, including a key study
that officials from the former Bush administration intend to deliver shortly to the
Obama White House. [3]
[1] Article prepared by Lolita C. Baldor, in Washington, DC.
First published online by Associated Press ( AP ) ,
17 January 2009.
[2] There are currently 33,000 US troops in Afghanistan – 15,000 troops with the
NATO-led coalition [ISAF] and 18,000 who are fighting insurgents and
training the Afghan Army and the Afghan Police. In Iraq, there are 142,000
US troops – still more than before the recent force build-up,
which is credited, in part, for the decline in violence in
Iraq.
[3] President Obama is also awaiting a comprehensive report regarding
security issues throughout the region from the chief of
Central Command, General David Petraeus.
|
|
|