|
CASR
Canadian American
Strategic Review
|
- Canadian Defence Policy, Foreign
Policy, & Canada-US Relations - |
|
Defence Policy Conservative Party
December 2005
Stephen Harper announces the new defence policy put
forward by the Conservative Party of Canada Pt 7
Dianne DeMille & Stephen Priestley this article has
been expanded from 'briefing notes' prepared by CASR for the CBC on 22 December
2005
Rapid Emergency Response or Making 44°N to 82°N Seem Like a Quick Trip
Other than training staff and about 500 more Canadian Rangers, the Conservative Party plan envisions needed Land
Force deployments North being accomplished by their planned airborne battalion and airlift capacity stationed
at CFB Trenton [for] a rapid emergency response capability throughout the entire Arctic region.
The merit of the Conservatives scheme to recreate Airborne will be debated elsewhere. It is simpler to ask: are
paratroops an efficient way of maintaining a presence in the Arctic? The Tories see Airborne as a rapid
emergency response force. It would have to be. Consider the distances involved. As an example, the
air distance from CFB Trenton to CFS Alert, on the northern tip of Ellesmere Island, is approximately 4200km (roughly the
same flying distance as from Vancouver to Gander in Newfoundland).
Airborne are meant to be tough but who could be ready to parachute into combat (or any emergency) after a flight of
4000km or more? Of course, in the nearly thirty years that the Canadian Airborne Regiment was in existence, it never
deployed by parachute. So why have the Conservatives singled out paratroopers for an Arctic role? It might have
more to do with promises made at Trenton than with the Arctic.
In his 13 Dec 2005 announcement at Trenton, Mr. Harper promised airlifters of all sizes: the smaller fixed-wing SAR, tactical replacements for the Hercules , and a
new strategic airlifter. The latter, invariably, refers to Boeings
C-17. The Tory preferences for all three categories which are shared by most Air Force
planners reflect an upward size creep. [9]
Bigger isnt always better. The nimble, lightweight Twin
Otters would be replaced by new FWSAR aircraft almost as big as a Hercules. The Hercs
themselves would be replaced by the Airbus A400M (or, at
least, stretched C-130J model Hercules ). Biggest of all
would be strategic C-17s 53m long and weighing up to 265 tonnes.
Carrying a payload of over 70t , the C-17 can land in an extremely impressive 853m ( thanks to its blown
flaps and reverse thrust ). However, with that same payload, the C-17 will need over 2300m of runway to
take off again. In other words, a C-17 flying troops to the Arctic might be able to land at small northern air-
strips. Less certain is whether the fuel-ladened C-17 will be able to take off again. And this is where a revived
Airborne force comes in.
In the event that overly large airlifters cannot get in and out of short airstrips, its handy if the
passengers can find their own way to the ground. Seems like a good compromise ... but only if all of your plans
centre around Trenton in the far south. Build more small military airfields further north and the strategic airlifter
option for the Arctic suddenly looks less attractive. There are two possible solutions to the staggering
distances of the Arctic. Long and fast (the strategic airlifter approach) or shorter but plentiful (build
airbases in the North for smaller aircraft). Beefing up the Canadian Rangers north of 60 may be less dramatic than
mass parachute drops or strategic airlift, but the commuting distance will be so much more
manageable.
[9] The Tory favorites appear to be the C-27J Spartan for FWSAR (and northern utility), the A400M as
Hercules replacement (or, at least, complaints were voiced about the rush to buy J
model Hercs), and the Boeing C-17 as strategic airlifter.
[Update: in the spate of defence spending
promises made at the end of June 2006, no mention was made of either FWSAR or the Arctic Utility/CC-138 replacement.]
Dianne DeMille is the editor of the Canadian
American Strategic Review.
Stephen Priestley is the creator of DND 101 - A Visual Guide to CF
Equipment . |
|
|