|
CASR
Canadian American
Strategic Review
|
- Canadian Defence Policy, Foreign
Policy, & Canada-US Relations - |
|
Defence Policy Conservative Party
December 2005
Stephen Harper announces the new defence policy put
forward by the Conservative Party of Canada Pt 5
Dianne DeMille & Stephen Priestley this article has
been expanded from 'briefing notes' prepared by CASR for the CBC on 22 December
2005
Keeping a Grip or To find the hand of Franklin reaching for the Beaufort Sea
The Conservative Party plan includes an Arctic training centre at Cambridge Bay, Nunavut on the Northwest
Passage. Instructional staff would be made up of 100 Regular Force personnel. Arctic-specific training is a
good idea and any number of CF boots on the ground in the Arctic is an assertion of Canadian
sovereignty.
Say Northwest Passage and most Canadians will think of Viscount Melville Sound leading westward into the Beaufort
Sea. Alas, Cambridge Bay is on the wrong side of Victoria Island , facing south
to Queen Maud Gulf. So why this location? Until 1989, Cambridge Bay was the site of a DEW Line radar station. [6]
Not only does DND own land in the area (658 hectares), there is also a military-built airstrip (its runway is 1524m x
46m gravel with a terminal and hangar). In other words, the infrastructure is in place.[7]
Not made clear is whether Mr. Harper is talking about instructors training Regular Forces in Arctic warfare skills or
increasing the level of Ranger training or both. If the latter, it would be better to disperse
centres to reduce travelling times. If the former, we must also question the choice
of scarce Regular Force instructors.
If past Arctic exercises demonstrated anything, its that Rangers have a lot to teach about their region and its
conditions (Regular Force troops involved in EX Narwhal would be among the first to agree).
Since many courses in the south are delayed due to a shortage of instructors, why not make full use of the skill of
the more experienced Rangers, and have them instruct the courses? The operation of new kit can be taught
long distance or the instructors flown in.
Training the CF for Arctic warfare makes good sense and helps to assert Canadian sovereignty (especially if
training activities were spread throughout the region ). So, land-ownership issues aside, why concentrate
your efforts in Cambridge Bay? The answer is political. Interests in the hamlet proposed that a deep-water port be
built near Cambridge Bay. The Conservatives chose instead to back a rival bid by the city of Iqaluit economic
development office for a deep-water port of their own.
Cambridge Bays bid has been in the works for some time. Iqaluit only pitched their concept for a $49M port in
October of 2005 but this location has strategic advantages. So, in effect, the Cam- bridge Bay training centre is a
consolation prize. Nice gesture but it raises credibility problems.
Mr. Harper announced the deep-water port with the usual electioneering flourish. But Mr. Harper did not credit
a source for his port proposal. This concept did not originate with the Conservative Party, it was Iqaluit economic
development officer Kim Rizzi who brought the plan to Ottawas attention. She probably could not care less about
credit so long as the port gets built. But, assigning priority is part of academic protocol and
University of Calgary graduate Stephen Harper knows that.
[Also see CASR In Detail Breaking the Ice: Planning an Iqaluit Deep Water Port for Existing Plans for an Iqaluit Deep Water Port and Costing the Tory DWP Plan]
[6] That former DEW Line base, CAM-M, gained unwelcome media attention due to PCBs and heavy metal
pollutants (and apparent DND footdragging on cleaning up the landfill site didt aid appearances). Still,
interest by the hamlet of Cambridge Bay in buidling a civil/military deep-water port shows that DND is not
unwelcome.
[7] The Nunavut government committed $18M to pave the YCB runway which is scarred with ruts...caused by soft
soil giving way beneath the pressure of landing aircraft according to the Nunatsiaq News. YCB is 960km by air from Yellowknife.
Dianne DeMille is the editor of the Canadian
American Strategic Review.
Stephen Priestley is the creator of DND 101 - A Visual Guide to CF
Equipment . |
|
|