|
CASR
Canadian American
Strategic Review
|
- Canadian Defence Policy, Foreign
Policy, & Canada-US Relations - |
|
|
Canadian Defence Policy - Intervention - Disaster Response - January 2005
Do We Dither? Or Do We DART? –
The Department of
National Defence Needs a New List: 'Notes for Next Time'
Dianne DeMille and Stephen Priestley – column in the Winnipeg Free Press *
Canada's DART [Disaster Assistance Response Team] has finally arrived in Ampara,
Sri Lanka.
The Minister of National Defence, Bill Graham, has endured barbed
criticism for not deploying DART more promptly.
The world was faced with the most horrific natural disaster in living memory. Yet Canadian
officials were pondering whether our 200-strong DART was "the right
tool" for this particular calamity.
Was Canada dithering in public again? What were the problems with the deployment this time? How
can we overcome these problems for next time?
Background of DART
DART was formed in 1996 in response to a cholera outbreak which followed the genocidal massacres in Rwanda. When relief agencies could not get safe drinking water to the survivors fast enough to stop water-borne diseases from rapidly spreading throughout the surviving population, Canadian officials recognized the need to respond rapidly with a pared-down military force, equipped with essentials.
These essentials included a method of producing safe drinking water on-site, an agile medical response team and field hospital, a security force to protect the operation, and, above all, the power to communicate (under the most difficult circumstances) with political leaders and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) like Oxfam, CARE.
On Thursday, four days after the devastating tsunami waves struck 12 countries in Southeast Asia, Ottawa dispatched a 12-person 'reconnaissance team' to the disaster area to determine what the relief priorities were, who needed what, which countries would accept our help – and which wouldn't. Apparently, this is SOP (standard operating procedure) for any DART deployment.
Faster Ways to Collect Needed Information?
Couldn't some of this information be gathered over the telephone, or by email? After all, CARE Canada's Emergency Response Team was one of the first NGOs
to establish a presence in Aceh, the Indonesian province most affected by the tsunamis. Could this highly-regarded NGO not provide information about what kind of relief was required in that area, and whether a Canadian Forces presence would be welcomed by Indonesian officials?
There are even better sources of 'intel' in the region. No organization knows more about Indonesia than the Australian Ministry of Defence, since Australia considers Indonesia the primary threat to its national interests. Minister Bill Graham himself has the autonomy to contact his counterpart, the Australian Defence Minister, for relevant on-site assessments.
Coordinating Aid Efforts in the Region
Other nations acted with much greater speed than Canada. President George Bush was vacationing in Texas when the tsunamis hit, but, by Wednesday, had organized, through personal telephone calls and diplomatic contacts in various capitals, a coordinated effort by four countries in the area – Australia, India, Japan and the US, which has military bases and a significant naval presence in the region.
Australia took responsibility for Indonesia. Within days, at least two Australian Hercules transport aircraft had already landed at Banda Aceh, capital of the hardest hit region of that country, with medical and other relief supplies. India has taken responsibility for Tamil Nadu, the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, as well as Sri Lanka and the Maldives. The US and Japan were sending personnel and medical equipment to the other affected areas in the region.
The point is that this coordinated effort was done mainly by phone, fax and email. There was no need for a high-level reconnaissance team to fly to the area. All the information that was needed was available 'on the ground'.
It simply required someone to gather that information quickly, integrate the relevant facts, then make a decision, and act.
So, sending a Canadian reconnaissance team seems to be a debilitating bottleneck in the DART deployment process. It may be a step which can be eliminated in future crises. Just phone ahead. Contact consular staff. See if we're wanted – and where.
Break Down DART into Smaller Operational Units?
Canadian officials were speculating about whether DART needs to be broken down into smaller, more agile units. Here they may be on the right track. The name 'DART' implies a unified team but, in fact, the team consists of distinct operational elements.
DART was last deployed after a massive earthquake in Turkey in August of 1999. For that mission (Operation Torrent), all of the elements of DART were needed. In the tsunami disaster, lack of potable water is the most urgent need. That seems tailor-made for DART, which has several excellent, Canadian-made, diesel- operated ROWPU – reverse osmosis water purification units. Making water potable is one of the things the CF does best. The ROWPU portion of DART could act as a 'sub-unit', responding to specific requests where purified water is the top priority.
Ideally, each DART sub-unit (listed above) should operate like firefighters in a firehall. When the bell rings, they answer the alarm. The firehall's response protocol is already well-practised. No decision by the fire chief is required. To arrive late would be worse than useless. That's why a certain number of false alarms are tolerated – just turn around and go back.
Miniaturization of Water Purification Units (ROWPU)?
ROWPU units are so large that they were transported on trailers hauled by an HESV (Heavy Engineering Support Vehicle with a towing capacity of 18 tons). Lighter DART loads are handled by 1.5 ton LSVWs (Light Support Vehicles, Wheeled). In all, about 40 CF trucks – large and small – were ferried by leased Antonov An-124 transport aircraft to the airfield tarmac outside Sri Lanka's capital.
From Colombo, all of DART's equipment and personnel must be trucked to Ampara on the other side of the island nation. The roads these CF vehicles must travel were ravaged by the tsunami and now the monsoon season has begun. Ampara is inside the region claimed by the Tamil Tigers (LTTE) who have been fighting an armed insurgency against the majority Buddhist Sri Lankans, in hopes of establishing an Islamic homeland called 'Tamil Eelam'.
The security component of DART will be needed to protect the large ROWPUs. Such an advanced water purification unit would be a valuable prize for any leader of a
militant group trying to win the hearts and minds of local
Sri Lankans.
There is a theoretical efficiency to having a large, centralized source of water with an output that is absolutely pure, and a flow-rate of tens of thousands of litres per day. Such a unit would make most sense if it were to be set up in downtown London, Ont.
For the current purposes, however, we must take other factors into consideration. DART's initial deployment required two of the largest cargo planes on the planet. The ROWPU components must be housed in ISO containers – the 20-foot long steel shipping boxes more commonly seen being hauled by a train, rather than by a truck.
[Ed: to be strictly accurate, ROWPU is housed in its own container which is slightly smaller than an ISO shipping
container. A ROWPU container can fit onto a CC-130.]
Trucks must haul their technologically vulnerable cargo over inadequate roads. Then, after each large ROWPU is set up, it requires three technicians to keep it running. The CF also uses the so-called Mini-ROWPU which can be broken down into three separate loads for shipping. The volume of water processed by Mini-ROWPU is less than a large ROWPU but, once set up, the Mini-ROWPU require only a single water technician to keep it working.
In view of the difficulties of deploying 'full sized' ROWPU, the trade-off of a reduced output from Mini-ROWPU seems acceptable. If larger numbers of the Mini-ROWPU made up the DART water purification component, greater flexibility in both shipping and 'in-country' location could be realized. Each smaller unit could be set up and left with one qualified technician and a CF security team to protect the installation. Then the rest of the convoy could move on to the next logical location, set up another Mini-ROWPU, and so on. Transport problems (and scale) could be reduced while the requirements for qualified water treatment technicians would remain the same.
In the long run, Canadian personnel (either CF or CIDA) could train local technicians to maintain the Mini-ROWPU which could be left in place. Who knows? It could act as an incentive to order more Mini-ROWPUs from Canadian industry for the future. The whole world needs water. There is a long-term market for ROWPU technologies.
DART's Paralysis: The Need for Strategic Airlift
There is a final and perhaps most pressing question: How do we get our technology, technicians, medics, field
hospitals, and communication systems to a stricken area?
DART is made up primarily of CF Land Forces personnel, but it is largely dependent upon the transport aircraft
of Canada's Air Force to deliver the team to the scene of a disaster. Many Canadians may remember images of DART
troops unloading CC-130 Hercules aircraft in Honduras in the wake of Hurricane Mitch in October,
1998.
But delivering relief supplies to Central America in aging, propellor-driven Hercules is one thing.
Spanning the entire globe in this slow, tactical transport aircraft is quite another. Reaching East Timor in 1999
proved to be a major challenge for the CC-130s. The fleet has since had its electronics upgraded, but the planes
themselves have the same worn-out airframes, aged a few more years.
To handle large, awkward loads over long distances, the Canadian Forces – like most of Canada's NATO
allies – relies on the services of air-cargo charter companies from Russia or Ukraine. Through these firms,
large military-style cargo aircraft can be 'wet- leased', complete with their crews. Brokers for these deals are
Air Canada or SkyLink.
The difficulty in a disaster is aircraft availability. As soon as news of the tsunamis broke, civilian
aid agencies quickly began organizing relief efforts. Leasing a cargo aircraft would have been one of
the first items on everyone's agenda. In other words, whenever DND seeks to lease an Antonov for the deployment
of DART, it will be in direct competition with the transport needs of all the world's largest relief
agencies.
DART requires its own accessible, reliable air transport – both strategic and tactical. Canadian citizens
have repeatedly voiced their insistence on a fully internationalist foreign policy. That policy must be
reflected in Air Force planning and procurement.
For CF tactical airlift, replacing the worn-out Hercules fleet is simple. The Hercules is still
in production as the updated C-130J. This is the model of
Hercules purchased by Australia, and these new aircraft are now being used to provide relief to
Indonesia ...
[Update: Five years on, the first C-130J Hercules has yet to enter CF service (though is has now
left Lockheed Martin's paint shop in Canadian colours ). In Nov 2005, the then-Liberal government made moves to
sole-source new C-130Js from LM. This was halted by the newly-elected Harper Conservatives (who then went for much
the same deal). During the 2005-06 election campaign, the Tories had made an election promise of single-sourcing
another large transport aircraft. That resulted in an ACAN for C-17
Globemaster IIIs which makes moot any further discussion of CF strategic airlifters.]
* Published 02 Jan 2005 as a 'View from the West' column in the Winnipeg Free Press
This CASR version has been updated to take account of
recent developments.
Dianne DeMille is the editor of CASR. Stephen Priestley is its researcher/illustrator. |
|
|