|
CASR
Canadian American
Strategic Review
|
- Canadian Defence Policy, Foreign
Policy, & Canada-US Relations - |
|
Port Security, Coastal Patrol, & Maritime Defence 23 May 2004
'Integrated Deepwater Systems' The United States
focuses on port security and comprehensive coastal patrol
Adm. Thomas H. Collins, Commandant of the United States Coast Guard
Special Report** (excerpts), Sea Power, April 2003, Navy League of the US
[Ed: The United States Coast Guard
has a close relationship with the US Navy. The Coast Guard
has specific constabulary powers when operating
in ports or within the EEZ. Although part of the US military, the
Coast Guard must rely on the back-up of the Navy when the nation's
security is at risk. The purpose of the Deepwater
Project is to bring all USCG assets up to a level of operational
efficiency that will guarantee a seamless continuity
between the layered inshore forces and the Navy.]
Upgrading USCG assets
Over the years, all classes of USCG cutters have experienced a steady
decline in readiness that has taken them well below our target levels.
Our goal is to be free of major machinery or equipment casualties
72 percent of the time.
At the end of 2001, our 378-foot, high-endurance cutters
spent only 27 percent of the time free of
major problems in the 'C3' and
'C4' readiness categories.
(These are the two lowest categories of material
readiness included in the Department of
Defense's four-tiered system). Nearly half
(22) of our 49 110-foot patrol boats
have experienced significant degradation in hull integrity.
In the skies, our HC-130H long-range search aircraft benefited from
an infusion of program funding in recent years, but only the HH-65
helicopter meets our target of 71 percent availability. Many of our
aircraft also continue to operate with obsolete sensors or systems
possessing limited capabilities.
Current connectivity deficiencies another reflection on the
limitations imposed by aging legacy systems and our previous platform-centric
acquisition practices are especially worrisome, given today's
compelling need to be able to transfer data and information quickly
on an international playing field.
The need to support and maintain an antiquated, platform-centric force
also presents extraordinary logistical challenges. I am constantly
impressed by the way our young men and women are able mostly
through their hard work and ingenuity to keep our aircraft
flying and our cutters at sea.
The Coast Guard's spiral of declining readiness is the compound result
of many factors: deferred modernization, aging assets, increased maintenance,
higher total-ownership costs, past funding migration to support current
operations.
To implement our new maritime homeland security plan, the Coast Guard
needs new capabilities. The Integrated Deepwater System will
deliver precisely those needed capabilities when the platforms and
systems envisioned in this program begin to enter service.
Fortunately, the past two years' funding increases*
to the Coast Guard's operating budget, and the
president's proposed budget for fiscal year 2004,
will allow us to apply critically needed resources to address our
most pressing near-term readiness concerns.
Deepwater an integrated 'system of systems'
Last June's contract award to Integrated
Coast Guard Systems a joint venture between Lockheed Martin
and Northrop Grumman opened an exciting chapter in the Coast
Guard's recapitalization and transformation program. Deepwater
places the Coast Guard on a clearly defined course for future operational
excellence and an improved ability to safeguard the nation's maritime
security.
The Deepwater program entails far more than the progressive
modernization and eventual replacement of our aging inventory of cutters,
patrol boats, fixed-wing aircraft, and helicopters. Most importantly,
it provides an integrated 'system-of-systems' approach to upgrade
existing legacy assets through a low-risk transition to full capability
with new platforms including unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)
and highly improved systems for command, control, communications,
computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR)
and integrated logistics.
Bell Helicopter has
been awarded a contract for its tilt-rotor vertical-launch unmanned
aerial vehicle (VUAV) the Eagle Eye to commence
preliminary design work for the first phase of the UAV portion of
the Deepwater program. The contract calls for Bell to design
and build 3 prototype Eagle Eyes for testing by 2005.
Also in February, the 110-foot USCGC Matagorda became the first
of our 49 Island-class patrol boats to enter the Bollinger shipyard
in Lockport, Louisiana, to undergo conversion to a 123-foot vessel
with upgraded operational capabilities. The modifications planned
include the fitting of a stern ramp to enhance small-boat launch-and-recovery
operations. The short-range Prosecutor, our new seven-meter
boat, will add to the patrol craft's capabilities. A new deckhouse,
new berthing compartments, a new galley, an improved air-conditioning
system, and other enhancements will improve habitability and quality
of life for the crew when they are underway.
[Ed: The converted USCGC Matagorda was delivered in early
March 2004.]
The Coast Guard's inventory
of HH-60J and HH-65 helicopters will also
be modernized with new avionics or other system improvements
over the next five years. New maritime patrol aircraft,
helicopters, and VUAVs will improve significantly
our surface-surveillance capacity and capabilities. Deepwater's
total-aviation solution of manned and unmanned platforms, at completion,
will deliver 80 percent more flight hours than today's legacy systems.
Although originally conceived with 'deepwater' missions in mind, their
suitability for a wide range of homeland-security operations is clear.
Deepwater's enhancement of USCG operational capacity
Deepwater's three new classes of cutters will be designed for
higher sustained transit speeds, greater endurance, and longer range.
In addition, these cutters will be able to launch and recover our
improved small boats, helicopters, and unmanned aerial vehicles. We
have arrangements in place to work more closely with the US Navy,
which is currently developing its new 'Littoral Combat Ship'. This
arrangement is part of the updated National Fleet agreement that I
signed last July 2002 with the Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral
Vern Clark.
Our new cutters and aerial platforms will permit greater integration
and full interoperability among our own assets and those of the US
Navy. Our allies and friends overseas also are interested in the possibility
of adopting Deepwater assets to meet their own recapitalization
requirements.
In addition to their improved operational capabilities and ease of
maintenance, the modern platforms provided by Deepwater will
be safer for our men and women to operate both at sea and in the air
they will also reduce today's worrisome potential for shipboard
fires, for single-engine aircraft landings, and for accidents similar
to one dangerous incident in which a boat davit failed from metal
fatigue after decades of exposure to the corrosive effects of seawater.
Deepwater's heightened C4ISR capability
In the context of maritime homeland security, perhaps Deepwater's
most significant capability enhancement will be in the area of C4ISR.
Deepwater's C4ISR system is structured so that new capabilities
are designed, developed, integrated, and tested in increments.
The Deepwater C4ISR system will play a key role in improving
our ability to develop our 'maritime domain awareness'. This will
meet the needs, not only of operational decision-makers, but also
those of tactical commanders engaged in operations at sea, ashore,
and in the air. This 'network-centric' system will ensure that we
maintain seamless interoperability with the forces and agencies of
the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security, as well as a broad
spectrum of other federal, state, and local agencies in short,
it will be a true 'force multiplier' in the fullest sense.
In addition to its contributions to maritime domain awareness, Deepwater's
C4ISR system will allow operational commanders to share a common 'picture',
so that they can employ forces more productively, and manage risk
wisely.
The requirements for Deepwater's C4ISR
architecture call for it to be
fully interoperable with Rescue 21. Full integration
of IDS with Rescue 21 will enhance our force-allocation
capabilities within US coastal areas. The ability to exchange both
distress and security-related data between surface, air, and shore
assets will serve as a force multiplier both in the prosecution of
SAR (search-and-rescue) emergencies and in our ability to acquire
maritime domain awareness, greatly improving the effectiveness of
harbor-security operations.
Inherent flexibility and utility
Although the Integrated Deepwater System's platforms will be
designed to incorporate the robust operational capabilities needed
to carry out the most challenging open-ocean missions, they also will
offer national decision-makers the inherent flexibility and utility
common to all naval forces.
The Integrated Deepwater System will lead to the Coast Guard's
transformation an ongoing process entailing major intellectual,
cultural, and technological changes. It will create joint competencies
and partnerships from separate individual-service and agency capabilities.
Keeping the Deepwater program on course for successful execution
is one of my highest priorities, because it will provide the fastest
and most efficient way to improve our nation's maritime security and
safety. Deepwater will enable the Coast Guard to maintain a
credible presence in key maritime regions to deter potential threats
to US sovereignty. It will provide the nation with the best maritime
security capabilities possible, and dramatically improve our ability
to carry out the numerous military, law-enforcement, search-and-rescue,
and other missions assigned to the Coast Guard.
The Coast Guard's predecessors in the Revenue Marine answered the
call more than 200 years ago when the Congress charged them to "...
defend the sea coast and repel any hostility." The Integrated
Deepwater System will give the Coast Guard of today and tomorrow
the means to continue that proud tradition.
*
Our FY 2003 budget includes the largest funding increase in
the Coast Guard's history more than $913 million
in new operating expenses, more than $101 million in capital
assets, and (when combined with the FY 2002 supplemental)
the funding needed to pay for 2,000 new billets.
The FY 2004 budget proposed by the president will allow us to recapitalize
legacy assets and pay for Rescue 21 the
nation's primary maritime distress system for coastal waters. It
will also allow us to build out our homeland-security assets, as
well as sustain our traditional mission levels.
**The Special Report
by Admiral Collins appeared in the April 2003 issue of
Sea
Power Magazine, published by the Navy League of the
United States.
|
|
|