|
|
Background
— CF Mini-UAV candidates — Boeing/Insitu ScanEagle |
|
Update DND now has a renewable
lease contract with Boeing to provide contractor-supported ScanEagle SUAV (Small UAV) operations at Kandahar
Airfield. With the end of CF combat operations in Afghanistan, that contract may not be renewed. No CF
designation for the leased ScanEagle was announced but a 2009 Directorate of Flight Safety publication
mentions a "CU165" – likely a ScanEagle reference.
|
|
A Fish Story with a 'Watchful Eagle' In Place
The Boeing-Insitu ScanEagle is based on a civil UAV (the SeaScan used by commercial fishers).
The ScanEagle layout is the least conventional of CF mini-UAV candidates (the low aspect-ratio wings are
swept with endplate vertical tails fitted to either tip). The SeaScan's arrangement is not unique
among UAVs – the absense of conven- tional empennage allows for a pusher propeller – as it frees the
nose for the placing of sensors. [1]
|
|
|
Data for ScanEagle: wingspan 3.1m, length 1.2m, fuselage diameter 0.2m, max takeoff weight
18kg, sensor payload 6kg, endurance 15-to- 20 hours, max speed 120 km/h, cruise speed 90 km/h, service ceiling 5000m
to 5790m, camera range 100+ km, engine 3W 24i (23 cc 1.1kW).
|
|
[1] The CF's Sperwer TUAV achieves the same benefit through its delta-winged pusher-propeller
layout. But delta wings aren't especially stable at low speed (or even higher speeds, apparently: a later
model, jet-powered Sperwer-HV (Haute Vitesse) has canard surfaces fitted).
[2] Many early UAVs (eg: Pioneer) recovered with nets (although the makers prefer descriptions like
"energy absorbing device"). Today, parachute is the most common recovery method. But this is poorly
suited to shipboard recovery. With its sea-going heritage ScanEagle, addressed this problem from the outset.
Complaining that this is a "single system" solution , the USN seems to prefer expendable
UAVs.
|
|