|
|
BG Archive
— CF Mini-UAV candidates — IAI Malat I-View 50 |
|
Update
Elbit's Skylark has been chosen as the CU-168. It's not clear whether this is the outcome of
DND's 29 Nov 2005 announcement of a $10M contest for 10 mini UAVs or whether this and the IOR order for
5 mini UAVs (plus options on 5 more) are simply one and the same.
|
|
I View, You View, We All View – IAI Malat I-View 50
One of the more elusive candidates for CF mini-UAV is the I-View 50 from the Malat Division of Israeli
Aircraft Industries. I-View 50 is the smallest member of a family of 'light' tactical UAVs
whose designations are derived from their respective take-off weights: 50, 125 or 250kg. Since no images have
been released of the I-View 50, our depiction above is very speculative. (Based on larger I-Views, we
assumed a proportionately small payload bay and electric motor.)
|
|
|
Far more information is available on the one I-View model purchased so far – the I-View 250
was bought for the Australian Defence Forces in late 2005, fulfilling the Australian Army's Joint Project
129 tactical unmanned air vehicle requirement. The I-View 250, as its designation suggests, is a
substantially heavier aircraft. I-View 250 is also powered by a two-cylinder, two-stroke piston engine.
However, in layout, all members of the I-View family are essentially similar – a tractor propeller,
pod-and-boom fuselage, and 'V' tail – in contrast to earlier IAI Malat UAV designs.
|
|
|
Although the I-View (top, right) is shown taking off from a paved runway, the intended operational
method is far simpler. An I-View is meant to be launched from a catapult (as are most small UAVs). Where
the I-View differs is in landing. Recovery by parachute is common (that is how the CF Sperwer TUAVs land) but the I-View does not use a
parachute, exactly. Instead, I-View deploys a para- foil which allows a controlled descent (through powered
flight) to ensure a soft landing. I-View is said to be able to land within 50m radius of its aiming
point and turned around within a few minutes. The I-View 50 should have even lighter landing loads than its
kin.
|
|
|